Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/2890
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorYücel, Şebnemen
dc.contributor.authorDündar, Bilgen-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-22T13:48:33Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-22T13:48:33Z-
dc.date.issued2011en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11147/2890-
dc.descriptionThesis (Doctoral)--İzmir Institute of Technology, Architecture, İzmir, 2011en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves: 187-199)en
dc.descriptionText in English; Abstract: Turkish and Englishen
dc.descriptionxii, 199 leavesen
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is intended as a contribution to the understanding of modernization in the early Republican period (ERP) architecture, namely including the neglected attitudes. It criticizes the stylistic periodizations such as "National Style" and "International Style" and rigid classifications such as classifications of Sedad Hakkı Eldem only as the forerunner of national architecture and Seyfi Arkan only as the forerunner of the international architecture in Turkey. This study aims to transcend these reified categories by presenting the varieties and contradictory approaches that existed in architectural theory and practice. This dissertation aims to develop a new reading of the ERP architecture by questioning the categories that were constructed by the first generation of architectural historians who produced their texts between 1973 and 1983. The main aim of this dissertation is to show simultaneous existence of different modernities in the ERP architecture. By revealing different understandings of new architecture in architectural theory, architectural pedagogy and architectural practice, this dissertation focuses on the heterogeneity of the architectural milieu. The first generation of architectural historians constructed the ERP architecture with Euro-centric set of theories, and with conventions such as categorizations and stylistic periodizations. They also read that periodʼs architecture within the frame of the nation-building process. In their texts, the architecture followed a linear and progressive modernization process, paralleling the nation-building process. By tracing the different understandings of modern architecture in architectural theory and tracing different tendencies of architects in architectural practice, this dissertation aims to question not only the categorizations and stylistic periodizations, but also this linear and progressive modernization ideal.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIzmir Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectArchitectural historiographyen
dc.subject.lcshArchitecture--Turkey--History--20th centuryen
dc.titleAgainst style: Re-reading "new architecture" in early republican period in Turkey (1931-1940)en_US
dc.typeDoctoral Thesisen_US
dc.institutionauthorDündar, Bilgen-
dc.departmentThesis (Doctoral)--İzmir Institute of Technology, Architectureen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryTezen_US
item.openairetypeDoctoral Thesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Phd Degree / Doktora
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
413220.pdfDoctoralThesis8.32 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

122
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Download(s)

178
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.