Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/2906
Title: Cognitive strategies of analogical transfer in design: Differences between expert and novice designers
Authors: Doğan, Fehmi
Hafızoğu Özkan, Özgü
Issue Date: Dec-2011
Publisher: Izmir Institute of Technology
Abstract: Analogy is an essential tool of human cognition that enables connecting two systems with casual relations. Previous research in analogy has focused primarily on role of analogy in creative domains. In literature there is lack in understanding the different levels of expertise and the remoteness of source and target domains; how these parameters impact the nature of analogies and stages of analogical transfer in a more holistic view. Thus we aimed to understand analogy mechanism to develop design education for achieving creative solutions transferring interdisciplinary knowledge effectively in the light of cognitive differences of novice and expert designers. An experimental study is conducted to understand the mechanism of analogy in design. 40 source domains were manipulated in four categories; (1) bus stop, (2) architecture, (3) artifacts, (4) nature. 373 students and 22 expert designers attended to the experiment. The experiment focused on first; the selecting one of the source domain groups and an example from this group, and second; designing a bus stop by analogical reasoning. In this research first we analyzed the relation between expertise levels and distance of source domains. Second, we analyzed the relation between expertise levels and the level of similarity. Third, we analyzed overall relations of these parameters; how local, regional, remote and long-distant analogies influence the level of similarity. Finally, how expert vs. novice retrieval of source domain affected the creative analogy process in design. Findings lead us to understand relation between expertise, the acquisition of knowledge and creative thought. Results showed that expert designers generally selected local domain which is the less potential source domain for creativity, and novice designers generally selected long-distant domain which is the most potential source domains for creativity. However, in design process analogy and literal similarity increased parallel to the expertise levels contrary to anomaly and mere appearance similarity. Education develops the ability of analogical reasoning. However it conditioned the designers in the selection of source domains.
Description: Thesis (Doctoral)--İzmir Institute of Technology, Architecture, İzmir, 2011
Includes bibliographical references (leaves: 106-120)
Text in English; Abstract: Turkish and English
xiv, 131 leaves
Full text release delayed at author's request until 2015.01.19
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11147/2906
Appears in Collections:Phd Degree / Doktora

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
421728.pdfDoctoralThesis3.42 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

60
checked on Oct 3, 2022

Download(s)

44
checked on Oct 3, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.