Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/2952
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorAkkurt, Sedaten
dc.contributor.authorBudak Ünaler, Meral-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-22T13:48:39Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-22T13:48:39Z-
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11147/2952-
dc.descriptionThesis (Doctoral)--Izmir Institute of Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Izmir, 2013en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves: 155-164)en
dc.descriptionText in English; Abstract: Turkish and Englishen
dc.descriptionxi, 164 leavesen
dc.descriptionFull text release delayed at author's request until 2016-08-06en
dc.description.abstractExcavation in Byzantine castle, known as Kuşadası Kadıkalesi, Anaia provided ceramic finds which dates back to mid 12th and 13th century of Mid Byzantine period. These finds were produced as serial products. In first part of the thesis 47 samples with four different decoration repertoire; Fine Sgraffito, Incised-Sgraffito, Incised and Champlevé, were analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM-EDX), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) methods, in order to identify the three distinct layers in cross sections: body, slip and glaze layers. Body was largely composed of SiO2, Al2O3, CaO, Fe2O3, Na2O and K2O along with other less abundant elements. Slip had similar chemistry but with less Fe2O3. The glaze was composed mainly of lead oxide. Between the glaze and the slip some new well formed crystals of lead feldspar were found to precipitate in dimensions of roughly 10-50 m. Statistical analysis tools like Hierarchical Clustering Analysis (HCA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were used to see if any groupings were possible between the samples collected. Dendrograms indicated that these ceramics were made of two different types of clay. In second part of the thesis, replicate samples of earthenware pottery were manufactured in the laboratory to mimic the formation of the glazed pottery. Similar microstructural features were identified. Another HCA study was done to compare the Anaia samples with the literature. Dendrograms obtained showed some similarity. However, it was not possible to strongly and conclusively say that the two sample groups were related.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIzmir Institute of Technologyen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subject.lcshPottery, Byzantineen
dc.subject.lcshPottery--Analysisen
dc.subject.lcshScanning electron microscopy in archaeologyen
dc.subject.lcshX-ray spectroscopy in archaeologyen
dc.subject.lcshArchaeology--Methodologyen
dc.title"Fine-Sgraffito ware," "Aegean ware" from Anaia: An analytical approachen_US
dc.typeDoctoral Thesisen_US
dc.institutionauthorBudak Ünaler, Meral-
dc.departmentIzmir Institute of Technology. Mechanical Engineeringen
dc.relation.publicationcategoryTezen_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeDoctoral Thesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Phd Degree / Doktora
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10011858.pdfDoctoralThesis17.29 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

118
checked on Nov 14, 2022

Download(s)

156
checked on Nov 14, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.