Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/2984
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDoğan, Fehmi-
dc.contributor.authorUzunoğlu, Erdal-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-22T13:48:42Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-22T13:48:42Z-
dc.date.issued2008en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11147/2984-
dc.descriptionThesis (Doctoral)--İzmir Institute of Technology, Architecture, İzmir, 2008en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves: 216-221)en
dc.descriptionText in English; Abstract: Turkish and Englishen
dc.descriptionxv, 417 leavesen
dc.description.abstractPlaces of industrial production, emerged in the 18th century, were originally places where different manufacturers would use the same space together. These early factories provided the tools and machinery needed, but each manufacturer would conduct its own production separately. This mode of production went through transformations to increase productivity and efficiency for high profit. Correspondingly, the demand for efficiency resulted in strict surveillance of workers and production. The realization that space has potentials in administering .efficiency. and .surveillance. led to a transformation in the morphology of industrial space. In the same process, technological inventions, new ideas on production methods and construction technologies all had undeniable effects. However, industrial sites were ultimately transformed into places where the ruling power would directly control the labor force.This study focuses on power relations played out in industrial space through a study of four Sümerbank factories namely Nazilli, İzmir, Bergama and Manisa. A comprehensive research is conducted on the instrumentalization of industrial space in the administration of power relations and on the development of industrial space. Data related to cases of the study were collected through field trips, archival research and interviews with some ex-employees of the factories. These factories are analyzed in terms of .efficiency., .discipline. and .surveillance. which are influential in the formation and transformation of the industrial space. It is concluded that these factories were mainly shaped according to efficiency and productivity as it was in the rest of the world rather than according to ideals of modernization solely and that they were places where new socioeconomic classes were formed regardless of the state ideology which preached a class-free society.Key words/phrases: power relations, industrial workspace, architecture of industrial structures, efficiency, inspection, discipline, panopticon, Turkish industrialization, Sümerbank factories.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIzmir Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subject.lccNA6403.T9 U99 2008en
dc.subject.lcshArchitecture, Industrial--Turkeyen
dc.subject.lcshTurkey--Politics and govermenten
dc.subject.lcshIndustrializatim--Turkeyen
dc.titleThe constitution of power relations in spacesof industrial production: The case of four Sümerbank Campuses in the Aegean Regionen_US
dc.typeDoctoral Thesisen_US
dc.institutionauthorUzunoğlu, Erdal-
dc.departmentThesis (Doctoral)--İzmir Institute of Technology, Architectureen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryTezen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeDoctoral Thesis-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Phd Degree / Doktora
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
T000700.pdfDoctoralThesis9.93 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

98
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Download(s)

478
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.