Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/4188
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorYücel, Şebnem-
dc.contributor.authorDemirel Özer, Sinem-
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-19T07:31:26Z-
dc.date.available2014-11-19T07:31:26Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11147/4188-
dc.descriptionThesis (Doctoral)--İzmir Institute of Technology, Architecture, İzmir, 2014en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves: 171-182)en_US
dc.descriptionText in English; Abstract: Turkish and Englishen_US
dc.descriptionviii, 210 leavesen_US
dc.description.abstractSince the 1960s environmental discourse has entered into architectural theory and practice in effective ways, inducing disciplinary transitions in all three categories: artefacts, knowledge and practices. This dissertation emphasizes the discursive character of this “environmental turn” in architecture and aims to make explicit its significance for Turkey. To that end, the dissertation reviews four Turkish architectural periodicals covering a time span of 49 years from 1963 to 2012. The data is then used for tracing of the formation of the discourse on environmental architecture in Turkey by illustrating how certain concepts and themes arose at specific time periods and their transformations in time. In that context, the dissertation emphasizes three concepts – environment, sustainability and energy-efficiency- and in revisiting these in a sequential and overlapping fashion a general outlook of the conditions in which the discourse on environmental architecture have emerged is sketched. Such an analysis reveals the transformation of environmental considerations from that of radical reflections to legitimate concerns in Turkey. Yet, it also displays that this “legitimation” is based on an unquestioned “givenness” of the objects and statements of the discourse. This, in return, creates a speculative basis of legitimacy removing it from its social and economic contexts. This study has taken on this challenge by emphasizing the system of formulating the problems –namely the “problematic” of the discourse as its main concern. In that context, it first of all presents the analysis of the mechanisms in which environment has risen as an important problem of architecture in Turkey, and secondly, reveals the relations of this process to the nature of solutions proposed. In the end, by emphasizing the taken-for-granted assumptions and generalizations inherent in the discourse on environmental architecture in Turkey, the dissertation aims to open up for new avenues in which new formulization of the problems could emerge.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIzmir Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCritical discourse analysisen_US
dc.subjectArchitectural discoursesen_US
dc.subject.lcshArchitecture--Environmental aspects--Turkeyen_US
dc.titleEnvironmental discourse in Turkish Architectureen_US
dc.title.alternativeTürk Mimarlığı'nda çevre söylemien_US
dc.typeDoctoral Thesisen_US
dc.departmentThesis (Doctoral)--İzmir Institute of Technology, Architectureen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryTezen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeDoctoral Thesis-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Phd Degree / Doktora
Sürdürülebilir Yeşil Kampüs Koleksiyonu / Sustainable Green Campus Collection
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10047000.pdfDoctoralThesis2.03 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

84
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Download(s)

590
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.