Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/5685
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAydoğdu, Canan-
dc.contributor.authorKaraşan, Ezhan-
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-02T13:01:19Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-02T13:01:19Z-
dc.date.issued2016-06-
dc.identifier.citationAydoğdu, C., and Karaşan, E. (2016). Goodput and throughput comparison of single-hop and multi-hop routing for IEEE 802.11 DCF-based wireless networks under hidden terminal existence. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 16(9), 1078-1094. doi:10.1002/wcm.2588en_US
dc.identifier.issn1530-8669-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1002/wcm.2588-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11147/5685-
dc.description.abstractWe investigate how multi-hop routing affects the goodput and throughput performances of IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function-based wireless networks compared with direct transmission (single hopping), when medium access control dynamics such as carrier sensing, collisions, retransmissions, and exponential backoff are taken into account under hidden terminal presence. We propose a semi-Markov chain-based goodput and throughput model for IEEE 802.11-based wireless networks, which works accurately with both multi-hopping and single hopping for different network topologies and over a large range of traffic loads. Results show that, under light traffic, there is little benefit of parallel transmissions and both single-hop and multi-hop routing achieve the same end-to-end goodput. Under moderate traffic, concurrent transmissions are favorable as multi-hopping improves the goodput up to 730% with respect to single hopping for dense networks. At heavy traffic, multi-hopping becomes unstable because of increased packet collisions and network congestion, and single-hopping achieves higher network layer goodput compared with multi-hop routing. As for the link layer throughput is concerned, multi-hopping increases throughput 75 times for large networks, whereas single hopping may become advantageous for small networks. The results point out that the end-to-end goodput can be improved by adaptively switching between single hopping and multi-hopping according to the traffic load and topology.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofWireless Communications and Mobile Computingen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnalytical modelen_US
dc.subjectGoodputen_US
dc.subjectIEEE 802.11en_US
dc.subjectThroughputen_US
dc.subjectNetwork routingen_US
dc.subjectConcurrent transmissionen_US
dc.titleGoodput and throughput comparison of single-hop and multi-hop routing for IEEE 802.11 DCF-based wireless networks under hidden terminal existenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.authoridTR56325en_US
dc.institutionauthorAydoğdu, Canan-
dc.departmentİzmir Institute of Technology. Electrical and Electronics Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1078en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1094en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000379694300007en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84928567310en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/wcm.2588-
dc.relation.doi10.1002/wcm.2588en_US
dc.coverage.doi10.1002/wcm.2588en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.dept03.05. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Electrical - Electronic Engineering / Elektrik - Elektronik Mühendisliği
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
5685.pdfMakale1.63 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Mar 22, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
checked on Mar 27, 2024

Page view(s)

116
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Download(s)

150
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.