Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/13647
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGören, Ayşegül Yağmur-
dc.contributor.authorKobya, Mehmet-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-27T19:51:12Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-27T19:51:12Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.isbn9781119791461-
dc.identifier.isbn9781119791454-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781119791461.ch15-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/13647-
dc.description.abstractBecause of the toxic impacts on human health, the arsenic (As) limit value in drinking water was decreased from 50 to 10 ?g l-1 by the relevant authorities (WHO 1993; US EPA 2001). In this case, the problem of As pollution in natural water resources used for drinking water has grown even more and turned into a global crisis. According to reports in many parts of the world, over about 230 million people appear to be affected by high arsenic concentrations in groundwater. In this case, it turned out that there was a great need for cost-effective and environmentally friendly technologies from drinking water sources. One of the emerging water treatment technologies in recent years is electrocoagulation (EC) and it has been seen that it is effective in treating As (>99%) from water and eliminates some of the disadvantages of other conventional treatment processes. EC method includes electro-oxidation of anode electrode materials (iron and aluminum) and in situ production of coagulant agents. From groundwater resources with As content of 5-1000 ?g l-1, As removal efficiencies and operating costs (OCS) of EC technology using iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al) anodes were 85.0-99.9% and 0.0020-1.04 US$ m-3, respectively. Different types (plate, scrap, rod, and ball) of electrodes were used for As removal with the EC process, and it was observed that Fe electrodes or Fe-Al hybrid electrodes performed better in As removal. In addition, it has been determined that arsenate (As(V)) removal is more effective than arsenite (As(III)). A significant quantity of As(III) is oxidized in the EC process, resulting in precipitation, adsorption, and metal-oxy hydroxylic complex reactions. EC process has a lower OC to achieve As removal below the permissible WHO value compared to conventional treatment processes, accomplishing it as a further applicable option for As removal. © 2023 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArsenic in Plants: Uptake, Consequences and Remediation Techniquesen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectArsenic removalen_US
dc.subjectElectrocoagulationen_US
dc.titleArsenic removal by electrocoagulationen_US
dc.typeBook Parten_US
dc.institutionauthorGören, Ayşegül Yağmur-
dc.departmentİzmir Institute of Technology. Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.startpage287en_US
dc.identifier.endpage314en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85147962063en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKitap Bölümü - Uluslararasıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/9781119791461.ch15-
dc.authorscopusid56329481700-
dc.authorscopusid6701530739-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeBook Part-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept03.07. Department of Environmental Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Environmental Engineering / Çevre Mühendisliği
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

44
checked on May 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.